National Center of Womens Innovations

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931467678
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Alexandria, VA, USA
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Science and Technology Museums

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,031
Expenses
$17,697
Assets
$232,728

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • BK Fulton (Board Member)
  • Jane Plitt (Chair and Founder)
  • Karina Drees (Board Treasufer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Showcase and promote the achievements of yesterdays todays and tomorrows women innovators through a high-tech educational platform to inspire solutions for the future. The NCWI will be a place of discovery delight and insight. Contributions are tax-deductible. Women innovators have been under-recognized if not hidden from mainstream perceptions about who influences society. Womens technical creativity is largely unknown and thereby fails to inspire others while reinforcing the false belief that world solutions are a males domain. This discourages other women and girls while impeding the development of new ideas and inventions from which the world can benefit. A national center is needed to raise public awareness and solutions for the public academic and business communities while inspiring a diverse group of innovative students.

What it reported doing in 2024

Our Program Education expense category was the largest expense during 2024. We built our exhibit highlighting the achievements of Dr. Gladys West.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 49
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 17.6%; rating input score 18
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 85.4%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.15; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 141.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.4% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 84.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 17.6% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $18K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 18/100.