National Capital Physicians Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811085170
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Rockville, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3019214300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,686
- Expenses
- $11,249
- Assets
- $7,208
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT B KARP MD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUSAN D'ANTONI (EXECUTIVE DI)
- ROBERT B KARP MD (PRESIDENT)
- DUANE TAYLOR MD (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Form 990-ez part iii primary purpose dedicated to advancing the practice of medicine and improving population health in the national capital region through education, recearch and innovation.
What it reported doing in 2025
Form 990-ez part iii line 28 program service accomplishments enhancing physician health and wellbeing - initiated an early intervention counseling program, physicians resource network, for physicians which provides at no cost, confidential counseling to physicians suffering from burnout. The counselors are msws and phds. Physicians can receive three visits with counselors. The visits are paid for by the national capital physicians foundation. At the present time, physicians who practice medicine in montgomery county are eligible for the services. With future fudraising, the foundation plans to expand the service area to the entire national capital region. (counseling fund)
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 20
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -205.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -39.7% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -35.5% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.