National Cancer Support Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843048378
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Pompton Lakes, NJ, USA
Phone
8883324359
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$128,000
Expenses
$81,518
Assets
$57,629

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rachel Berkenbush (Executive Director President)

People named in this filing

  • Alexus Webb (Trustee)
  • Rachel Berkenbush (Executive Director President)
  • Matthew Webb (Trustee)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

National Cancer Support Foundation primary mission is to support children diagnosed with cancer and assist their families, we also work to educate the broader community about cancer risks, prevention, cancer screenings and early detection. By raising awareness for adults and families, we strengthen our commitment to reducing the impact of cancer across all ages.

What it reported doing in 2025

Social media outreach, and fundraising activities such as cancer bracelets attached to brochures about cancer awareness and healthy living to try and prevent cancer. Ducks for Jeep owners with a duck and a card attached about cancer awareness, early detection, promote healthy lifestyle, as well as children with cancer helpful guidance for families going through this heartbreaking time.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 93.7%; rating input score 94

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 36.3%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 83.3% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 63.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 135.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 93.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $76K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.