National Cancer Research Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 113481804
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Lancaster, PA, USA
- Phone
- 6315843100
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,427
- Expenses
- $75,023
- Assets
- $12,079
- Liabilities
- $108,176
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
1 person listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LORA EICHHORN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- LORA EICHHORN (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To help give an understanding of cancer with a different approach as an assistance to conventional methods.
What it reported doing in 2025
Society views cancer as an outside invader and utilize symptomatic chemically toxic treatments as though it is the disease instead of reverse engineering to determine the root source of the cause, often leading to additional and more serious illnesses, blamed as "progression" instead of "side effects" - how can you apply un-natural material and expect natural results. We are showing that cancer and other illnesses are the "result" of mineral deficiencies, which change the mineral structures of nucleotides in the dna by similar but not correct minerals, changing the communication and domino effect reactions, changing how cells and chemistries are made. Our approach is to "reverse engineer" the "result" to determine the root cause(s), correct the cause, which corrects the structure of the nucleotides, causing corrected communication and domino effects, causing correct manufacture of cells and chemistries, and no longer makes the "incorrect" cells and chemistries, causing the previously made "incorrect" cells to no longer survive in the "corrected" environment and die from their own starvation, which breaks down in a natural non-toxic manner. This pathway applies to what society refers to as illness and disease. Because the body requires specific minerals in a specific proportion to each other, when provided in the correct proportions to each other, even when provided in high volume in the correct proportion to each other, there is no toxic environment and metabolism will be correct - give the body what it requires and it will function correctly.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -131.4%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.96; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $72K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.