National Business Travel Association Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742664824
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3614258855
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $170,297
- Expenses
- $133,445
- Assets
- $127,708
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Amanda Wheeler (President)
- Stephanie Shives (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Amanda Wheeler (President)
- Heather Vickers (Secretary)
- Julianna Luna (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
GBTA - Austin Chapter is an organization of corporate travel managers and coordinators and travel industry suppliers. We are a professional organization dedicated to: providing a venue for the sharing of travel-related information and professional expertise conducting informative and educational meetings on current travel industry topics that provide members with increased knowledge skill and ability to manage travel
What it reported doing in 2025
Texas Education Day, GBTA Convention, Legislative Summit, these events are educational not only to the members we provided scholarships of over 15,000 for our members to attend, but also to a much broader audience. Legislative Summit allowed members to speak to representatives about important travel topics, the Texas Education Day and GBTA Conventions are both educational programs on a State and national level.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 80% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 68% for direct work, and 32% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 44
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 40%; rating input score 40
- Program expense ratio: 51%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 21.6%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.96; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.8% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 40% of revenue deployed · 51% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $68K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.