National Association of Women in Construction
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464600998
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8178775551
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $80,094
- Expenses
- $99,497
- Assets
- $53,228
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
People named in this filing
- HEATHER GONZALEZ (MIDWEST REGION FUND GUARDIAN)
- KAREN KRIETLOW (MIDWEST REGION FUND TRUSTEE)
- JODI WIEMERSLAGE (MIDWEST REGION FUND TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The national association of women in construction (nawic) originally began as women in construction of fort worth, Texas. Sixteen women working in the construction industry founded it in 1953. Knowing that women represented only a small fraction of the construction industry, the founders organizaed nawic to create a support network. Women in construction of fort worth was so successful that it gained its national charter in 1955 and became the national association of women in construction. Today, nawic provides its members with opportunities for professional development, education, networking, leadership training, public services and more through a network of 13 regions through out the united states. The accomanying form 990-ez presents the financial information for the midwest region only.
What it reported doing in 2022
Spring forum typically held in april or may is an opportunity to bring together the chapters within the midwest region for professional development, education, networking, leadership training and communciation from nawic national
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 98% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 33
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.53; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -8.4% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.9% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $96K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2018 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.