National Association of Women in Construction

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
426096495
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Des Moines, IA, USA
Phone
5159813069
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,786
Expenses
$60,638
Assets
$47,376
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ASHLEY CULVER (PRESIDENT)
  • CJ SHERZAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KELLI PASKERT (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MADIE CHURCHILL (DIRECTOR)
  • JILL STOKER (DIRECTOR)
  • ASHLEY HALLS (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The national association of women in construction (nawic) is committed to championing women to impact the direction of the construction industry. Nawic provides education, community, and advocacy for women.

What it reported doing in 2024

Block kids: the purpose of block kids is to introduce children in grades k-6 to the construction industry and create awareness of the many career opportunities in the construction field. The goal of block kids is to not only plant the seed for workforce development, but also instill the sense of pride and accomplishment inherent in "building their project for real."each participant is her/her own "general contractor and will use 100 lego building blocks, rock, string, foil, and/or heavy poster board as building materials for 45 minutes of heavy construction. 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place awards will be given, with the winning project going to a regional competition where he/she will compete to move on to the national competition.parents and chaperones are encouraged to attend, but will be kept separate from the kids during the construction process. Strict guidelines are set, and any participant who receives any outside help with their construction project during the competition will be disqualified.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 60% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 92% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 47
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.6%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 49.5%; rating input score 49

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.8%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.6% of revenue deployed · 49.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 49/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.