National Association of Social Workers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 135643515
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, US
- Phone
- 800-742-4089
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $37,983,463
- Expenses
- $39,566,776
- Assets
- $104,705,363
- Liabilities
- $28,710,113
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
29 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- YVONNE CHASE (PRESIDENT)
- FATIMA SALMAN (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ANTHONY ESTREET (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
Highest reported compensation
- ANTHONY ESTREET (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $419,798 total reported compensation
- SEKOU MURPHY (CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER): $284,660 total reported compensation
- HEIDI MCINTOSH (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $272,313 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The National Association of Social Workers (NASW) works to enhance the growth and development of our members, to create and maintain professional standards for all social workers, and to advance sound social policies.
What it reported doing in 2024
Policy/program: preparing and disseminating issue briefs on a wide range of topics including substance use, ptsd, elder abuse, adverse childhood experiences, aging, and social work and law enforcement; and continuing to provide updates to the field on topics including the cms physician fee schedule, medicaid and medicare, telehealth flexibilities, the budget reconciliation bill; and the affordable care act; garnering wo stipends ($10,000) from the america public health association champion of change program. Completing and disseminating practice standards on school social work and clinical social work; presenting at national conferences; continuing to participate in national reimbursement coding meetings for health care providers; and providing technical assistance to social workers through "hour of private practice' conference calls and other means preparing and disseminating a blueprint of public policy priorities for the 119th congress; attending the democratic national convention for meetings with policy makers about the mental health and substance use crises and the need for a more diverse mental health workforce; working with congressional champions to introduce a social work month resolution; creating action alerts that led to thousands of messages being sent to congress on issues including telehealth flexibilities and the improving access to mental health act,; and sending a letter to the secretary of veterans affairs expressing nasw's concerns about workforce reductions at the veterans administration creating a 'stronger together' website with resources on the policies of the trump administration; a mobilizing against hate website with resources to help social workers address the rise in hate speech and violence; and revamping our social justice website, highlighting our social justice priorities, and including information and issue briefs on gerrymandering and voting rights holding the largest conference to date in chicago, with over 1,800 people attending in-person and over 400 more attending virtually, and convening a fall virtual forum on "mental health matters: working with children, youth, and families" which was attended by close to 400 professionals and featured plenaries and sessions on student mental health, youth suicide, gun violence, child welfare, social media, and artificial intelligence, just to name a few.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 90% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -4.2%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.65; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $420K · 29 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2M reported
- Consistency: 16 of 16 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.