National Association of School Psychologists
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237044121
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Bethesda, MD, USA
- Phone
- 3016570270
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,964,214
- Expenses
- $9,205,917
- Assets
- $32,426,833
- Liabilities
- $5,337,375
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANDREA CLYNE (PAST PRESIDENT)
- PETER FAUSTINO (PRESIDENT)
- SHAWNA RADER-KELLY (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ERIC ROSSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- KATHLEEN MINKE (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- PAVEL OBGOLZ (CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER): $354,575 total reported compensation
- KATHLEEN MINKE (FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $298,324 total reported compensation
- ERIC ROSSEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $261,529 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Nasp empowers school psychologists to promote the learning, behavior, and mental health of all children and youth.
What it reported doing in 2024
Professional development: national association of school psychologists (the association) hosts an annual convention for school psychologists either in-person, virtually or both. An in-person convention lasts several days and includes hundreds of scholarly presentations related to practice, training, and research. Numerous workshops are available for continuing professional development. The convention includes keynote and featured presentations on timely topics. The convention also provides an introduction and forum for graduate students in school psychology to gather and learn about the profession. An exhibit hall is sponsored and exhibitors represented include test and textbook publishers, trainers of school psychologists, computer and software manufacturers, etc. The association forms interest groups among its members to facilitate research and communication around specific topics. Additionally, the association develops continuing professional education courses for school psychologists to maintain their state and national certifications. The association may host other virtual professional development opportunities such as an advanced skills institute and a leadership institute; offer live and archived online professional development through an online learning center; develop crisis intervention and prevention materials and hosts crisis and crisis prevention training sessions; and provide leadership and "training of trainers" programs for these crisis programs.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 92
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 81%; rating input score 81; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.52; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 21.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $355K · 25 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $745K reported
- Consistency: 11 of 13 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.