National Association of Medicaid Directors
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 273258188
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, D.C., USA
- Phone
- 202.559.8360
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonmonetary Support N.E.C.
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,524,300
- Expenses
- $4,961,864
- Assets
- $7,669,929
- Liabilities
- $2,731,781
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Melisa Byrd (President)
- Cheryl Roberts (President-Elect)
- Lisa Lee (Immediate Past President)
- Cindy Beane (Immediate Past President)
- Amanda Kate McEvoy (Executive Director)
Highest reported compensation
- Amanda Kate McEvoy (Executive Director): $334,162 total reported compensation
- Dianne Hasselman (Deputy Exec Dir): $257,857 total reported compensation
- Karen Seaver Hill (Director of Leadership Development): $169,382 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Elevating and supporting Medicaid leaders so millions of people achieve their best health through sustainable programs.
What it reported doing in 2024
Conferences and Medicaid and Public Health Collaboration: NAMD hosted its Annual Membership Meeting in Chicago in June 2025 and its signature Fall Conference in Washington, D.C. in November 2024. NAMD conducted planning, agenda development, and follow-up activities related to these convenings. The Annual Membership Meeting is a gathering of NAMD members, senior agency staff from states and territories, and federal partners, with attendance of nearly 200 in 2025. The Fall Conference convenes over 1,500 national, state, and industry leaders, with 1,510 attendees in 2024 representing all 56 states and territories. Both conferences included board meetings and discussions related to organizational business. NAMD advanced efforts to operationalize Medicaid and public health partnerships by increasing literacy among Medicaid Directors and other health care payment officials on federal and state/territory public health priorities. NAMD fostered cross-sector connections and identified opportunities to align strategies and optimize Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), public health, and Medicaid funding for sustainable impact. Engaging all 56 states and territories through convenings, technical sessions, and interest groups, NAMD promoted workforce solutions with a focus on integrating non-traditional providers, or workforce extenders, as billable providers while addressing behavioral health and maternal health needs. In collaboration with HRSA and other national associations representing state and territory officials, NAMD co-led webinars, policy forums, and the National Committee for Sustainable Medicaid and Public Health Partnerships to coordinate approaches and amplify impact. NAMD also produced publications highlighting HRSA initiatives and state and territory innovations. These resources, including blogs, newsletters, thought pieces, and webinars, promoted best practices and reinforced cross-agency learning.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 63.1%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 73.6%; rating input score 74
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.2%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.55; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.36; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 27.1%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 63.1% of revenue deployed · 73.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $3.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $334K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $166K reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 30/100.