National Association of Division Iii Athletic Administrators

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814238640
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Westlake, OH, USA
Phone
4408924000
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,198
Expenses
$158,742
Assets
$251,902
Liabilities
$5,070

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA MOONEY (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTOFER SCHNATZ (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CRYSTAL GIBSON (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DONNIE BROOKS (THIRD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK A MANAK (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • LAURA MOONEY (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTOFER SCHNATZ (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • CRYSTAL GIBSON (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The national association of division iii athletic administrator's purpose is to empower its membership in their roles as administrators of athletics. The objectives of the nadiiiaa are to provide a collective voice for division iii athletics administrators, provide a forum to discuss issues that impact the role of the directors, provide a recognized relationship with other athletic administrator associations and ncaa leadership groups, and to provide helpful information to its membership. In 2025, the nadiiiaa had 1,503 dues paying members.

What it reported doing in 2025

In june, 2025 nadiiiaa held a convention in orlando, fl and 77 members and nonmembers from accross the country met to attend presentations, network and participate in discussions about current issues in athletic development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.