National Association of County Administrators Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521557554
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$153,118
Expenses
$73,959
Assets
$204,596
Liabilities
$15,134

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KENNETH WILSON (PRESIDENT)
  • BESY KELLER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • STEVE MOKROHISKY (PAST PRESIDENT)
  • AL VANDERBERG (VICE PRESIDENT MIDWEST REGION)
  • ROBERT WILSON (VICE PRESIDENT MOUNTAIN PLAINS REGION)
  • IAN COYLE (VICE PRESIDENT NORTHEAST REGION)

People named in this filing

  • KENNETH WILSON (PRESIDENT)
  • BESY KELLER (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • STEVE MOKROHISKY (PAST PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The National Association of County Administrators NACA encourages professional development for county administrators and provides information and resources to its members to improve the management of county government NACAs purpose is achieved through the following Sharing knowledge information and experience among the members of the association Assisting counties with the establishment or improvement of effective county administration in the United States Encouraging continued professional development of county administrators Developing and maintaining a professional association with the International CityCounty Management Association ICMA in order to assist the National Association of County Administrators NACA and ICMA to achieve their general goals and objectives Assisting the National Association of Counties NACo on matters having an impact on county government

What it reported doing in 2024

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 80% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 51.7%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.77; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.