National Alliance to End Sexual Violence

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
043701833
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Chantilly, VA, USA
Phone
2028698520
Rating
83
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,144,705
Expenses
$1,061,022
Assets
$636,242
Liabilities
$24,151

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MONIKA JOHNSON HOSTLER (PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • THERESE M POORE (POLICY DIRECTOR): $164,881 total reported compensation
  • MONIKA JOHNSON HOSTLER (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $59,771 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the national alliance to end sexual violence is to educate the policy community about federal laws, legislation, and appropriations impacting efforts to end sexual violence. The naesv publishes written analysis, tracks legislation, provides media interviews, and advises members of congress and the executive branch. The naesv's mission is to be the voice for state coalitions and local programs working to end sexual violence and support survivors.

What it reported doing in 2024

In fy2025, the national alliance to end sexual violence (naesv) advanced its mission through national advocacy, coalition support, and capacity-building initiatives. We hosted a congressional briefing with the bipartisan task force to end sexual violence during sexual assault awareness month, amplifying survivor needs and legislative priorities. In june, we convened 40+ sexual assault coalitions and culturally specific organizations for a national meeting, fostering collaboration on prevention and policy strategies. Our naesv/nnedv advocacy day brought 70+ advocates to capitol hill to push for survivor-centered policies. Additionally, naesv participated in key national conversations, including the samhsa gender-based violence and behavioral health panel, and led workshops at the 2025 national sexual assault conference, sharing insights on housing, policy trends, and collaboration. With the addition of two new full-time staff members, we expanded our ability to support coalitions nationwide. Our training and technical assistance capacity grew through three major federally funded projects: the national sexual assault housing collaborative (ovw-funded), the voca project (in partnership with nnedv and tribal coalitions), and the naesv sexual assault capacity building center (ofvps-funded), strengthening voca implementation, housing support, and cross-sector collaboration. Through these efforts, naesv remains committed to ensuring survivor-centered policies, funding, and resources across all levels of government.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 63% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 79
  • Accountability: 83
  • Sustainability: 43
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83.5%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 90.1%; rating input score 90
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4,292.46 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 7.3%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.6; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.5% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 10.5% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83.5% of revenue deployed · 90.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 8 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $956K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $165K · 9 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 25 of 25 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.