National Alliance of Two-year College Athletic Administrators

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
431477267
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2012–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Westlake, OH, USA
Phone
4408924000
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$163,903
Expenses
$109,305
Assets
$173,673
Liabilities
$2,750

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KANOE BANDY (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTEN SCHUTH (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DOMINIC DIMAGGIO (THIRD VICE PRESIDENT)
  • PATRICK A MANAK (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KANOE BANDY (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTEN SCHUTH (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DOMINIC DIMAGGIO (THIRD VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The national alliance of two year college athletic administrators (natycaa) is dedicated to the continuing growth and development of two year college athletics and the individuals involved. Natycaa does so through the exchange of information, monitoring of legislation, promotion of academic excellence, increasing communication between organizations, and encouraging a high degree of integrity in all endeavors. In 2025, natycaa had 844 dues paying members.

What it reported doing in 2025

In june 2025, natycaa held a convention for its members who are collegiate athletic administrators. 91 members from around the country met in orland, fl to attend presentations, discuss issues, network and elect officers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 63% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 72
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 46.4%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 33.3%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.59; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 2% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 46.4% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.