National Accreta Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
821064446
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Saratoga, CA, USA
Phone
5712289005
Rating
64
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,364
Expenses
$13,975
Assets
$155,895
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Kristen Terlizzi (Director)
  • Brianna Evans (Director)
  • Mykalynn Penny (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

National Accreta Foundation's mission is to amplify the experience of those impacted by placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) to improve quality of care and patient outcomes. National Accreta Foundation does this by increasing awareness of accreta and cesarean overuse, advocating for moms and babies, and connecting patients and providers with resources to help improve quality of care.

What it reported doing in 2025

Awareness Raising: Expenses include merchandise purchases, shipping costs, email marketing and website. National Accreta Foundation advocates to spread the word of increased rates and risk factors associated with Placenta Accreta Spectrum, including cesarean overuse. Our annual campaign unites survivors, families, and supporters to fuel our mission. More than 150 shirts, sweatshirts, blankets and more are shared annually with the community to raise awareness and build a stronger community. Over 89,000 people turn to accretafoundation.org as their trusted, evidence-based source for everything related to PAS. Monthly newsletters are shared with 2,000 newsletter subscribers to inform the community of NAFs involvement with maternal health, advocacy efforts and ways to support other accreta survivors.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 87
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 24.8%; rating input score 25
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.2%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 11.16; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 24.8% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $14K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 25/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.