National Academy of Human Resources Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850427733
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Sag Harbor, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6302417993
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Economics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,578,024
- Expenses
- $1,231,410
- Assets
- $4,985,315
- Liabilities
- $28,106
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DANIEL MARSILI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DANIEL MARSILI (PRESIDENT): $300,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
In 1994 the national academy of human resources (nahr) foundation was established to further contribute to the profession of human resources by conducting outreach initiatives for the profession through various programs, projects and studies that reflect the interest of its fellows and is responsive to the needs of the human resources profession, business, government and society.the nahr foundation accomplishes its objective by developing and supporting unique programs and studies that enhance the human resources profession in ways that reflect the special nature of the academy by utilizing the immense individual and collective experience and wisdom of the fellows, both active and retired. Additionally, through its various programs and initiatives, the nahr foundation strives to develop in students and other qualified individuals interest in the human resources profession as a career.
What it reported doing in 2025
The chro and cpo academies are executive development seminars for the senior-most hr leaders of organizations. Additionally, the chro and cpo academies provide an opportunity to gain the perspective of boards and ceos regarding their expectations for chros and cpos.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 83% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Accountability: 71
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 71.1%; rating input score 71
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 22%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.05; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 24.4%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 15.1% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 71.1% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 17 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $988K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $300K · 17 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.