National 4-H Council

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
362862206
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, USA
Phone
2022486800
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Youth Development - Agricultural

Reported finances

Revenue
$47,459,546
Expenses
$44,260,491
Assets
$140,739,141
Liabilities
$19,845,275

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

38 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jill Bramble (President and CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jill Bramble (President and CEO): $595,747 total reported compensation
  • Heather Elliott (SVP Chief Development and Marketing Officer): $391,621 total reported compensation
  • Stan Harrell (SVP Chief Financial Officer): $381,096 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

National 4-H Councils mission is to expand opportunities for all of Americas youth through increased investment and participation in 4-H positive youth development. The 4-H system is comprised of a unique private-public partnership between our nations land-grant universities Federal and local government agencies foundations and professional associations. These partners work together to provide rich educational content and curricula cutting-edge technology and innovative thought-leadership.

What it reported doing in 2024

Academic & career readiness: by harnessing the national and local power of the 4-H network we are scaling programming to accelerate our impact and amplifying youth voice as we prepare a 4-H beyond ready generation. Through this work we are empowering our six million 4-Hers to be ready for work and life across every county and parish in the country. Millions of young people lack access to opportunities that would develop the skills they need to succeed including confidence teamwork creativity and innovation. 4-Hs national youth events engage teens and educators from around the country to find answers to problems and equip them to create change. This empowers them to become leaders; the next wave of innovators who influence others and live the ideals that foster a vibrant and creative economy. Our annual youth event ignite by 4-H see high school students and extension professionals convene in the Washington D.C. Area for immersive experiences that empower them to connect and find their spark. Ignite attendees explore the best 4-h has to offer in stem agriscience animal science healthy living civic engagement and career readiness through experiences that include career panels career preparation educational workshops and the development of local engagement plans. We situate youth at the center of every storytelling opportunity. Whether its digital storytelling partnership engagements or pr opportunities we ensure our young people are involved and elevated. One of the most impactful examples of our storytelling is our 4-H youth in action program which amplifies the diverse stories and leadership of 4-H youth who are making a difference in their communities every day. Each applicant receives digital interview and storytelling training from 4-H professionals as well as national multi-media and spokesperson opportunities. In addition our four youth in action winners receive a scholarship for higher education; a year of personal professional and media development and training; national opportunities to serve as a spokesperson and key thought leader in their program area; all-expenses paid trips for themselves and a chaperone to travel as a 4-H ambassador; an official reference letter from a national 4-H council leader for educational or career purposes; networking opportunities; and documentary-style videos that position each winners community work to local and national media.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 86% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 72% for direct work, and 28% for grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 58
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 63.2%; rating input score 63
  • Program expense ratio: 61.6%; rating input score 62
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.09 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 99.4%; rating input score 99; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: No; rating input score 0

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.7%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.18; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -4.3% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.6% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 63.2% of revenue deployed · 61.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $27.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $596K · 38 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.3M reported
  • Consistency: 44 of 46 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 101 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 91 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Related-party transparency scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 29/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.