Nashville General Hospital Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621383977
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6153414431
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $642,750
- Expenses
- $606,263
- Assets
- $936,050
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WOODS WELLBORN (PRESIDENT)
- GLENN M BRADLEY JR (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)
- LYN PLANTINGA (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER BALOG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JENNIFER BALOG (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $124,856 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To support the patients, families, staff and community of nashville general hospital.
What it reported doing in 2024
Food pharmacy this program provides no cost fresh produce and shelf stable foods for anyhospital patient identified with food insecurity. Nutritious foods are provided in response to thepatient's diagnosis with special care for diabetes, hypertension, and cancer. Resources aremaximized by paying for shelf stable products from second harvest food bank, when possible.outreach food program the foundation initiated the outreach food program during the 2020tornado and covid-19 pandemic to provide volunteer-delivered food bags to those identified inthe community with food insecurity. Outreach food totes include the same nutrient-dense produceand shelf-stable products suitable for diabetic or hypertensive individuals. More than 634,000meals have been offered from the food pharmacy and outreach programs. [email protected] to get outreach totes delivered: name/address/phone/# in the home.low health literacy low health literacy is the degree to which individuals have the capacity toobtain, process, and understand basic health information needed to make appropriate healthdecisions. 9 out of 10 adults lack the skills needed to manage their health and prevent disease.health people 2030 has now identified health literacy as a cornerstone for its programs nationally.53 completed topics including 19 general health topics in english and spanish, 12 topicstargeting teens and vaccinations, 8 topics for diabetes and 14 topics for oncology patients inenglish, spanish and arabic. These materials are used with patients, food tote recipients and thegeneral community. Currently, the foundation and hospital teams are working on hypertension, senior adult health literacy and future broadcast quality videos.nashville takes on covid as a part of the low health literacy initiatives, nashville takes oncovid is a community-wide campaign of more than 80 organizations and individuals dedicatedto improving the rate of covid 19 vaccinations and wearing of masks. The effort is led by thefoundation and neighborhood health.patients medication fund this fund underwrites the provision of essential medications forpatients unable to afford those costs until links to community long term resources are secured.several thousand patients have been supported since its inception in 2020.support for cancer patients beyond medical needs team chad and individual donors providefunds to support the nutritional, transportation, and housing needs of oncology patients, with thegoal of providing as much personal stability for highly challenged patients and families duringoncology treatment and recovery.project warm this program raises the visibility of clothing needs during fall and winter forhospital patients and families. Individuals and businesses donate blankets, sleeping bags, socks, hats, gloves and much more for discharged patients without suitable clothing.art program for nashville general hospital the installation of original art atnashville general hospital beginning in 2016 might be categorized as cultural enrichment, butoriginal art in the healthcare setting is a critical "healthy distraction." although the phrase mayseem incongruous, it actually describes the benefit to the patient accurately, because the patientis distracted from the premonition and preoccupation which the unknown brings to an ill person.to date, 146 original works of art have been donated or loaned to the nashville general hospitalfoundation for the therapeutic benefit of patients.employee care fund ngh foundation works with the employee care committee to respondto emergency needs for employees in times of crisis.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 90
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 61.6%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 65.3%; rating input score 65
- Fundraising efficiency: $55.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 96.8%; rating input score 97; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 20.6%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.6% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.9% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 61.6% of revenue deployed · 65.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $396K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 24 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.