Nashville Area Junior Chamber of Commerce Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
620729404
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$56,730
Expenses
$169,959
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

22 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIM HONIBALL (PRESIDENT)
  • ELLIE IVANCICH (PRESIDENT EL)

People named in this filing

  • KIM HONIBALL (PRESIDENT)
  • ELIZABETH HALL (TREASURER)
  • ELLIE IVANCICH (PRESIDENT EL)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide opportunities for young professionals to succeed in business, serve the community, interact socially, promote the nashville area, and become the next generation of leaders in middle Tennessee.

What it reported doing in 2022

The chamber provides monthly membership meetings free of charge to current members. Each meeting provides a presentation from local speakers knowledgeable about various current events affecting nashville young professionals. The chamber also provides monthly networking events for current and potential members so young professionals can interact socially and promote local businesses. Annually, the organization holds a leadership institute that provides selected young professionals with professional development to assist them in finding and developing their leadership style. The chamber had approximately 200 members during the year.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 86% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 95
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 10
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 86.5%; rating input score 86

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -199.6%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 86.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $147K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 22 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.