Nashville Area Chamber of Commerce

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
620304530
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Nashville, TN, USA
Phone
6157433000
Rating
52
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,992,273
Expenses
$14,347,781
Assets
$16,949,451
Liabilities
$7,560,228

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

51 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHANIE COLEMAN (PRESIDENT)
  • APRYL CHILDS-POTTER (PRESIDENT, HCC)
  • RALPH SCHULZ (FORMER DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT & CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • RALPH SCHULZ (FORMER DIRECTOR & PRESIDENT & CEO): $719,321 total reported compensation
  • APRYL CHILDS-POTTER (PRESIDENT, HCC): $317,497 total reported compensation
  • JEFF HITE (CHIEF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT): $207,070 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The nashville area chamber of commerce facilitates community leadership to create economic prosperity.

What it reported doing in 2024

Education and talent development: the availability and preparedness of the nashville area's labor force is the number one driver of economic prosperity. The foundation's work helps ensure high school graduates, opportunity youth, Tennessee reconnect adults, and current workers are equipped with the credentials and experience necessary to increase the availability and preparedness of nashville area talent.new skills ready in october 2020, jpmorgan chase selected nashville as one of six u.s. Sites for the new skills ready network, a $7 million investment over five years to support the seamless transition of underrepresented students from metro nashville public schools (mnps) into postsecondary credentials, degrees, and high-wage, high-demand careers. The foundation serves as site lead and fiscal agent. Partners include mnps, nashville state community college, tcat nashville, middle Tennessee state university, the Tennessee department of education, the Tennessee higher education commission, the Tennessee department of labor and workforce development, the Tennessee board of regents, the Tennessee college access and success network, the scarlett family foundation, and the mayor's office.during fy25, the grant entered an extension period through october 2025, with the foundation invited to apply for and receive a subsequent no-cost extension running through march 2027. Sustainability defined the year's work, with partners embracing shifts that positioned the collaborative to continue beyond the original five-year term.career-based learning at mnps expanded from 55 students in 20212022 to 360 students by the close of fy25, supported by growth in employer partners from 15 to 23. While new skills ready anchored the model, work-based learning infrastructure scaled district-wide beyond the original four nsr high schools. Dual enrollment continued to grow as institutional partners assumed sustained roles in coordination and delivery, with tcat nashville continuing its partnership with mnps to support technical dual enrollment for academies of nashville students.college and career readiness coaches originally seeded by the nsr investment were sustained through school principal funding at all five participating high schools, including glencliff high school, which was added during fy25 and retained its newly placed coach. A foundation-supported pilot at overton high school placed a second coach to test whether expanded capacity could address acute student needs; overton sustained one coach following the pilot, with learnings about coach capacity informing broader strategy. A separate pilot tested a virtual work-based learning model in partnership with hari medical college, completing one cohort of approximately eight students; while the district did not sustain the virtual model, learnings about virtual work-based learning informed go-forward strategy.across the grant period, the new skills ready collaborative brought together more than seventeen partners spanning k-12, postsecondary institutions, state agencies, philanthropic partners, and local organizations, all working to address systemic inequalities and barriers to postsecondary access and persistence. The foundation's role as backbone organization convening and coordinating across the collaborative has been a key driver of progress and a foundation for sustainability. The foundation also convenes the academies of nashville partnership council, the district-wide advisory body for the academies model. During fy25, the council's focus centered on continued growth of work-based learning and embedding the h3 (high-skill, high-wage, high-demand) pathway definition into mnps's pathway approval process. Twenty-one of mnps's thirty-nine career pathways are now aligned with h3 sectors, including healthcare, it, and advanced manufacturing.social capital grant the social capital grant from the gates foundation, administered by education strategy group, concluded in the prior fiscal year. During f

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 35
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 36.9%; rating input score 37
  • Program expense ratio: 37.4%; rating input score 37
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.53 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.3%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 16.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.1% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 36.9% of revenue deployed · 37.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 42 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $719K · 51 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.3M reported
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 37/100.
  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 37/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.