Nashville Anti-human Trafficking Coalition
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 842896567
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
- Location
- Nashville, TN, USA
- Phone
- 6159561320
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Religion Related N.E.C.
- Affiliation
- Religious (unspecified)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,067,509
- Expenses
- $2,678,244
- Assets
- $5,785,521
- Liabilities
- $611,884
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANNE LUCAS (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- MARY TRAPNELL (EXECUTIVE DI): $127,401 total reported compensation
- CHRISTINA MEADOWS (OPERATIONS D): $114,700 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To rescue, restore, and resource women and children from the bondage of human trafficking and addiction.
What it reported doing in 2025
Educate to recognize etr raises awareness about human trafficking targeting middle and high school students, we equip teachers, parents, and guardians with the tools to recognize early warning signs of grooming and trafficking. Bringing relatable, preventative education and educational resources on human trafficking and addiction into the classroom and community. We create safe spaces for open discussions, allowing people to ask questions, gain knowledge, and learn practical ways to protect themselves, their family and their communities. Volunteer - naht's volunteer program equips individuals to serve survivors of human trafficking through christ-centered, trauma-informed support. Volunteers begin with a zoom-based first step training, followed by a background check and a 2-hour onsite session. Once trained, they can attend bible studies and classes with restore program members, build relationships, and join wraparound support teams. Volunteers also help with transportation, events, sweet daisy operations, and administrative tasks. Our letters of hope ministry offers encouragement through pen pal letters to women in detox or long-term care, along with monthly gatherings to write cards to restore members. In addition, our monthly reveille prayer group meets onsite to intercede for the mission, staff, and survivors. Volunteers are an essential part of our mission to rescue, restore, recognize, and resource survivors, providing practical help and spiritual encouragement as they walk alongside those on the path to healing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 93% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 56
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.2%; rating input score 53
- Program expense ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 58
- Fundraising efficiency: $6.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 87.5%; rating input score 88; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12.7%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.16; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 42.9% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 29.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 35.1% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.2% of revenue deployed · 57.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $127K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 53/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.