Nashua Police Patrolman's Charities

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
822316645
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2018
Location
Nashua, NH, USA
Phone
6035943500
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$184,933
Expenses
$132,272
Assets
$178,260

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN COLANGELO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MICHAEL B BRADLEY II (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JOSEPH FUSCO (FUNDRAISER)
  • ROBERT MAGLIO (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The objective of the nashua police patrolman's charities shall be to build positive community interaction with the youth of nashua and the police officers of the city of nashua, nh through various outreach programs. The nashua police patrolman's charities plans to have educational outreaches with children and families, including such topics as anti-bullying, online safety, drug prevention, and other topics that are relevant to the youth and family community. Another part of the mission is to build good youth and police interactions, through community building with police and the population. Some examples of the community building are "coffee with a cop", family fun night at greeley park", "shop with a cop", and when the need arises, targeting families and youth at risk with interventions to aid them, ex. (a drug user (a person hooked on drugs who is so desperate to get their next fix, they will steal things to sell to purchase more drugs) steals a youth's bike, the family is not in a f

What it reported doing in 2025

See schedule o.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 70% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.4%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 28.5%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.35; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 31% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 28.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 26.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.4% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $104K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.