Nashua Fish and Game Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 421494129
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Nashua, IA, USA
- Phone
- 6413305018
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fisheries Resources
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,200
- Expenses
- $11,035
- Assets
- $44,695
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- NICK MEAD (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- STEVE HUBERT (SECRETARY)
- MIKE OLESON (VICE-PRESIDE)
- NICK MEAD (PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the nashua fish and game club, inc. Is to promote, sponsor and conduct all types of sports, athletics and exhibitions related to hunting, fishing and boating events and any related activities. The club promotes shooting by providing a space for individuals to learn about weapon safety, practice marksmanship and compete in club sponsored tournaments. The club sponsors area high school trap teams.
What it reported doing in 2025
Adult league nights are held in february and 8 weeks in the spring and 8 weeks in the fall. A total of 11 league nights were held with 25 adults participating. Sponsored 2 large high school trap invitationals with over 100 area students participating in each.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 34
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 69.7%; rating input score 70
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -78%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.05; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 69.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.