Nasa Aeronautics Support Team Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
300041509
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Hampton, VA, USA
Phone
7578640444
Rating
42
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Reported finances

Revenue
$99,000
Expenses
$103,299
Assets
$167,411
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BRUCE HOOGSTRATEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • ROY V HARRIS JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • DELMA C FREEMAN JR (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BRUCE HOOGSTRATEN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DUNCAN E MCIVER (SEC/TREASURER)
  • ROY V HARRIS JR (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nast advocates for nasa and the nasa langley research center in southeast Virginia - trying to persevere and grow all things related to this federal facility. Nast works directly with Washington dc representatives to make sure the nasa federal budget is strong for the country and Virginia.

What it reported doing in 2015

Dissemination of information regarding aeronautics research and development which helped promote direct and indirect spending, retaining and creating new jobs and business opportunities in such areas as space exploration and earth science.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -4.3%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 58.1%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.