Naral Pro-choice New Hampshire Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
020496085
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
Concord, NH, USA
Phone
6032281224
Rating
93
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$61,058
Expenses
$75,490
Assets
$10,119
Liabilities
$6,398

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LAURA THIBAULT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • MONICA CIOLFI (CHAIR)
  • REBECCA FARVER (DIRECTOR)
  • RUTH PRATT (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Founded in 1997, naral pro-choice New Hampshire foundation is a 501 (c) 3 organization. Our mission is to support and protect, as a fundamental right and value, a woman's freedom to make personal decisions regarding the full range of reproductive choices through education, training, organizing, legal action, and public policy.

What it reported doing in 2013

Naral pro-choice New Hampshire foundation activities include training and leadership development programs, campus organizing projects, and pro-active policy campaigns. The training and leadership development program includes three main forums: choice conversations, grassroots 101 trainings, and talking about choice trainings. Naral pro-choice New Hampshire foundation is committed to a model of leadership development that encourages activists to learn new skills and assume leadership positions in the pro-choice community. Our accomplishments include the recruitment and training of several elected officials who have helped to shape pro-choice policy in New Hampshire. The naral pro-choice New Hampshire foundation's campus organizing program is dedicated to increasing the involvement of young women as community advocates for reproductive health policies. Students involved in our campus organizing program receive grassroots organizing and leadership training, fundraising training, and outreach materials. Our mission to support the full range of reproductive health options, including preventing unintended pregnancy, is demonstrated by our efforts to expand affordable access to family planning services. Our accomplishments include the support of several policy initatives that have expanded access to health care for women and their families in New Hampshire.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -23.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.13; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.63; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 31.2%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 36.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.7% per year; rating input score 0; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -77.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $75K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.