Nappanee Conservation Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
800210104
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
Location
Nappanee, IN, USA
Phone
5743540257
Rating
49
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreational l Clubs

Reported finances

Revenue
$141,418
Expenses
$129,982
Assets
$249,737

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HAROLD SCHMUCKER (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFF TINSLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JUSTIN YODER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • HAROLD SCHMUCKER (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFF TINSLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • JUSTIN YODER (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Sponsoring & promotion of sporting events and programs for the public to participate which: educate the public; improve or support conservation or encourage fishing, hunting, and related outdoor activities. Promotion of good sportsmanship and proper and safe use of firearms.

What it reported doing in 2024

Facility shooting/training events for members, familyand children as well as education and promoting of gunsafety and conservation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 21
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 56
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 20.4%; rating input score 20
  • Program expense ratio: 22.9%; rating input score 23

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.92; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.4% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 20.4% of revenue deployed · 22.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 20/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 54/100.