Napa Youth Lacrosse League

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205350813
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Napa, CA, USA
Phone
7072668517
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Amateur Sports

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$83,270
Expenses
$81,163
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joe Fischer (President)

People named in this filing

  • Joe Fischer (President)
  • Doug Williams (Treasurer)
  • Allison Whitlock (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Napa Junior Lacrosse Club (referred to as NJLC) is a volunteer based organization whose goal is to provide the youth of Napa Valley and surrounding areas an opportunity to learn and play the game of lacrosse. The NJLC is a member of the Northern California Junior Lacrosse Association.The NJLC provides players with a positive and fun experience that builds character and success. It accomplishes this by fostering commitment, good work ethic, team play and a positive attitude. We believe that winning is a by product of individual and team growth, and character development.The NJLC looks to serve the Napa Valley and surrounding areas with a fun and exciting venue. It provides athletes from all walks of life an environment that nurtures a common interest in fostering the game of lacrosse, and the opportunity to build life long friendships.

What it reported doing in 2017

The Organization provided training and coaching for Napa area youth in the sport of lacrosse. The League also sponsored competitive recreational lacrosse games. All coaching and training services are provided by volunteers.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 98
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 97.5%; rating input score 97
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.5%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.8% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 97.5% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $81K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 51/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.