Nancy Evans Dance Theatre
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 814664098
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Pasadena, CA, USA
- Phone
- 3233630830
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Arts, Culture, and Humanities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $41,068
- Expenses
- $35,028
- Assets
- $2,759
- Liabilities
- $758
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM KENNEDY (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- VIVIENNE COLLETT (DIRECTOR)
- NANCY EVANS DOEDE (DIRECTOR)
- BRAD GOLDSTEIN (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of nancy evans dance theatre is to create original works of dance theaterthat celebrate the value of storytelling by and for every generation; to feature typicallyunderutilized mature artists from 30 to 60 and beyond; to expose new and diverseaudiences to the beauty of life experience through traditional and non-traditionalmovement language; to empower our artists to be co-creators; to make lasting humanconnections.
What it reported doing in 2023
Creating original works of dance theaterthat celebrate the value of storytelling by and for every generation; to feature typicallyunderutilized mature artists from 30 to 60 and beyond; to expose new and diverseaudiences to the beauty of life experience through traditional and non-traditionalmovement language; to empower our artists to be co-creators; to make lasting humanconnections.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.7%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.08; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -29.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.