Namyausa

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843268104
IRS 990 coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2020
Location
Upper Darby, PA, USA
Phone
8562647060
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,624
Expenses
$18,799
Assets
$357,655
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

People named in this filing

  • FIDELMA DURUJI (ASSISTANT SECRETARY)
  • DR JULIET NJOKU (CHAIRWOMAN)
  • NGOZI OKAFOR (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Free medical clinic to uninsured and under insured, provide access for youth networking, scholarship, and youth empowerment for growth

What it reported doing in 2025

In alignment with the organizations mission to improve community health and expand access to care to the uninsured and underinsured, the Free Medical Clinic conducted a community outreach event and participated in professional development activities to enhance service delivery. Community Medical Outreach Event was held on September 28 2025 at St Cyprian Catholic Church 525 Cobbs Creek Parkway, Philadelphia PA 19143.Approximately 70 individuals excluding organization membersServices Provided Anthropometric measurements height and weight Blood pressure screening Blood glucose screening Cholesterol screening Dental screenings Vision screenings, Mental health screenings Health Education topics were discussed such as Hypertension management, Diabetes event ion and control, Mens and Womens Health, Immunization, Mental Wellness and Stress Management, Anxiety and depression awareness, and Suicide prevention Educational interventions were designed to promote self-management, early intervention, and appropriate utilization of healthcare services Professional Development and Comm

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 23
  • Transparency & Controls: 85
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 83
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 12.4%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 50.4%; rating input score 50
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 75.5%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 19.03; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23.3% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 12.4% of revenue deployed · 50.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $9K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 16 of 17 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.