Nami Sarasota and Manatee Counties Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
592464505
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Sarasota, FL, USA
Phone
9414443428
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Centers to Support the Independence of Specific Populations

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,452,293
Expenses
$2,357,925
Assets
$2,578,477
Liabilities
$120,182

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • COLLEEN THAYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • COLLEEN THAYER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $133,484 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Nami sarasota and manatee counties, inc. Improves the lives of individuals, families, and caregivers on their journey to mental wellness.

What it reported doing in 2025

Drop-in centers: beginning in summer 2021, nami sarasota and manatee counties opened their wellness drop-in centers, yana sarasota, in both north and south sarasota county.yana, an acronym for "you are not alone," aligns with the mission and values of nami sarasota and manatee counties. It's a safe space for adults 18 and over who are facing mental health challenges. Individuals can become members of a nurturing, non-judgmental environment where they can find a sense of community. Yana sarasota fosters an atmosphere where everyone is acknowledged and valued, opening opportunities for friendships, life skills, education, advocacy, and steps toward mental health recovery and well-being. Members are not only given a say in program activities but are also encouraged to contribute to yana sarasota's vision and actively partake in their personal wellness journey, all with the assistance of certified recovery peer support specialists.being peer-led and member driven, yana sarasota emphasizes collaboration among members and peer-staff, working together to tailor program activities that resonates with each participant's unique path to mental wellness and recovery. Integral to this approach is our member advisory council (mac), a member-led board dedicated to facilitating a conversation about the wants and needs of yana members. The mac serves as a vital conduit for member voices, ensuring that the programs and services offered not only meet but also reflect the collective aspirations of the community.at yana sarasota, we believe in multiple pathways to recovery. That's why we are thrilled to offer a nourishing morning snack and lunch every day to our members. Members, volunteers, and staff prepare meals, ensuring that everyone can start their day on the right foot. But that's just part of what we do. All programs at yana are entirely free of charge, allowing participants from all walks of life to engage, learn, and grow without financial barriers. From educational workshops to social events, there's something for everyone at yana.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 76
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 42
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.6%; rating input score 80
  • Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: $11.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 3.8%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.7%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 39.4% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 22.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.6% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $1.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.