Nami North Carolina Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 561438623
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Raleigh, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9197880801
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,033,299
- Expenses
- $1,834,156
- Assets
- $1,354,564
- Liabilities
- $203,563
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ANJIE VICKERS (PRESIDENT)
- GAIL PRUETT (VICE PRESIDENT)
- HOLLY DOGGETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- HOLLY DOGGETT (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $147,638 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of nami North Carolina is to promote recovery and optimize the quality of life for those living with mental illness.
What it reported doing in 2024
In fiscal year 2025, nami North Carolina (nami nc) expanded its statewide impact through coordinated outreach, direct services, and strengthened systems partnerships. The organization published 36 editions of tuesday newsday, reaching tens of thousands of north carolinians each month, and maintained consistent engagement across facebook, instagram, and linkedin to promote mental health awareness, recovery-oriented education, and access to services. Outreach efforts aligned with contractual objectives and key observances such as minority mental health month, suicide prevention awareness month, mental illness awareness week, black history month, autism awareness month, and pride month, utilizing digital publications, social media, and webinars to maximize reach.community engagement remained central to nami nc's work, with staff participating in more than 150 community events, presentations, conferences, and trainings statewide. These efforts reached children, youth, adults, families, students, faith communities, and underserved populations. Through in-person and virtual outreach, nami nc distributed more than 13,000 educational brochures and materials, increasing access to evidence-based mental health information, suicide prevention education, peer support, and recovery resources.the nami nc helpline continued to serve as a critical statewide resource, handling over 2,500 contacts via phone, email, and text. Call trends reflected increased need for housing assistance, direct mental health services, peer support, advocacy, and system navigation. Ongoing analysis of helpline data informed service improvements and outreach priorities, ensuring responsiveness to emerging community needs.programmatic delivery and workforce development exceeded expectations in fy25. Nami nc trained 127 program leaders across its signature programs and delivered more than 20 core programs and 88 signature programs statewide. Over 700 support group meetings were facilitated during the year. Nami nc also expanded its nami on campus initiative to 17 active campus clubs, supporting wellness events, peer engagement, and suicide prevention trainings at colleges, universities, and high schools across North Carolina.community inclusion and transitions to community living (ci/tcl) represented a major area of growth. Nami nc delivered community inclusion trainings with integrated tcl content, supported the implementation of all 15 approved ci/tcl mini-grant projects, and collaborated closely with dhhs, lme/mcos, and provider agencies to strengthen pathways to community integration, independent living, and peer connection for individuals with serious mental illness across rural and urban regions.in fy25, nami nc also advanced crisis intervention training (cit) through an expanded secondary contract, establishing the organization as the state's primary partner agency for cit. Nami nc hosted and presented at the bi-annual cit conference held february 2021, 2025, which included a sharing your story with law enforcement session and a cit appreciation luncheon recognizing law enforcement and system partners. Affiliates received funding and reimbursement to support cit trainings, and nami nc launched a public awareness social media campaign educating the public on how to request a cit officer when calling 911.through strategic partnerships, data-driven practice, and expanded contractual responsibilities, fy25 demonstrated nami nc's leadership in mental health education, advocacy, and systems change. The organization remains committed to organizing, educating, and empowering individuals and communities to improve mental health outcomes and advance a future where recovery is possible and no one faces mental illness alone.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 69% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 47
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.3%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.85 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.8%; rating input score 94; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 61.6%; rating input score 62; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 9.8%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.74; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 8%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.6% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.3% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.5M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $148K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 10 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 59/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 50/100.