Nami Metro

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
261659283
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2012
Location
Northville, MI, USA
Phone
2483487197
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Family Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,938
Expenses
$225,861
Assets
$719,059
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Leon Judd (Volunteer President)

People named in this filing

  • Marilyn Cibrario (Volunteer 2nd VP)
  • Cindy Kanczuzewski (Volunteer Recording Secretary)
  • Mary Ellen Judd (Volunteer Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

NAMI Metro will provide support education and advocacy as a grassroots all-volunteer organization dedicated to improving the life for all families and individuals who are impacted by mental illness and eliminating the associated stigma.

What it reported doing in 2025

EDUCATION: Families in Action FIA held Two ten-week educational classes to 61 family members who have a loved one with a mental illness. In Our Own Voice IOOV held four anti-stigma presentation to 250 participants through out the community. Ending the Silence ETS held mental health awareness presentations presented by peer family member and an individual in recovery to approximately three-hundred middle school and high school students. General Education Meetings are held monthly and are open to the public. Educational presenters are from surrounding Universities Mental Health agencies including peer speakers. Health Fairs: participated as a mental health organization in seven health fairs for the community three mental health awareness presentations presented by peer family member and individual in recovery to approximately 258 middle school and high school students. General Education Meetings are held monthly and are open to the public. Educational presenters are from surrounding Universities mental health agencies including peer speakers. Health Fairs: Participated in the education of community through the 60 various health fairs. A number of speaker bureau presentations made to wide variety of locations16587. In addition spoke at CIT Crises Intervention Police officer training in Oakland and Macomb Counties 12 classes totaling over 300 first responders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 50% for direct work, and 50% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 88
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 94.3%; rating input score 94
  • Fundraising efficiency: $201.62 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -68.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.18; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 46.7% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -7.4% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 94.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $213K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.