NAMI Mercer NJ Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222587453
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hamilton, NJ, USA
Phone
6097998994
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$567,686
Expenses
$552,118
Assets
$631,899
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Karen Marquis (Vice President)
  • Jared B Oberweis (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Janet M Haag (Executive Dir.): $115,844 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

NAMI Mercer NJ, Inc. is a local affiliate in NJ's Capital region of the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), the nation's largest grassroots mental health organization. Nami Mercer NJ, Inc. listens, leads, educates, and advocates, empowering families and individuals affected by mental illness to build lives of quality and respect free of stigma and discrimination.NAMI Mercer, Inc. relies on the talents of a small paid staff and a large team of volunteers to fulfill its mission.

What it reported doing in 2024

The NAMI Mercer Helpline is staffed by dedicated volunteers who fielded roughly 452 inquiries in 2024, 49% of which were first time callers. Utilizing VoIP, Helpline specialists provided a compassionate ear as well as valuable information and resources to help people better cope with the challenges of mental illness. Helpline Plus, a stepped-up level of care, provides an advocate to those with more complex needs related to system navigation, hundreds of hours were logged under this program. Demonstrating the importance of a network of support for adults living with mental illness, we offered three 8-session Family-to-Family courses, empowering families to better understand mental illness, access effective treatment, improve coping strategies, and better advocate for their loved ones. One was held in the Spring and two in the Fall, a total of 35 family members completed the course. We also continued our partnership with Intensive Family Support Services (IFSS) under Oaks Integrated Care, hosting 114 Family Support Group Meetings online or in a hybrid format, and providing space for IFSS specialists to meet in-person with individual families at no charge. With helping hundreds of family members/friends experience less stress and improve family functioning through the development of better coping strategies. The average participation per session numbered 12. Just Parents our support group for caregivers of youth under age 24 held 8 monthly meetings during which parents shared their experiences, resources, and how they navigate difficulties, leading to a sense of belonging and better role modeling for their children. Recognizing the power of peer support for individuals with mental health challenges, we offered NAMI Connection, a hybrid support group during which participants engaged in productive discussion and enhanced their coping skills, with an average of 5 participants per session. Members of our Just Friends and Becoming Friends social support groups participated in 200+ social activities, including parties, visits to museums, theaters, restaurants, and festivals with total attendance of 802. Our Hearing Voices Support Group met in-person for a total of 20 meetings with an average attendance of 5. Mending Mindsets, an online support group for those coping with anxiety held 20 meetings with a total attendance of 88. Weight ? Worth, a support group for those with an unhealthy preoccupation with food or body image, was held on campus at TCNJ and total attendance numbered 88. Two sessions of Healing Hearts, a support group for survivors of suicide loss, were offered. The summer session met 6x and the fall one 8x with total attendance of 66. The Empathy Network, a support group for those coping with depression, met weekly and averaged 12 participants per meeting. One six- week session of Working on Wellness (WOW) was held with a corporate partner; attendance averaged 9 per session. Through NAMI Mercers community education and outreach, we provided inspiration, strategies, and resources to promote mental wellbeing and expanded knowledge and understanding of mental illness. Our annual wellness conference, Harvest of Hope, was held in-person for almost 200 attendees, live-streaming Elizabeth Vargas as our keynoter, and offering practical, interactive workshops; thoughtful conversations rooted in personal experience; an uplifting performance; and plenty of opportunities for community-building. Twenty-seven community education events were held for over 700 attendees. Highlights include Crisis Intervention Training for law enforcement, faith community presentations and quarterly gatherings for TPH (Trenton Psychiatric Hospital) patients slated for discharge. NAMI Mercers NextGen (youth/school-based Initiatives) reached over 600 young people; and we participated in 23 community outreach events/wellness fairs/mental health awareness raising activities reaching more than 6,300 people. More than 500 people participated in NAMIWALKS Mercer

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 84% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 86
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.9%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 68.9%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.59 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.7%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 67.9% of revenue deployed · 68.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $381K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $116K · 15 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.