Nami Joplin

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
320013098
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2020
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2011
Location
Joplin, MO, USA
Phone
4177816264
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Association

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,027
Expenses
$7,182
Assets
$339
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Rebecca Ward (President)
  • Diana Harper (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Rebecca Ward (President)
  • Diana Harper (Vice President)
  • Suzanne Gray (Secretary (Part of Year))

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

NAMI Joplin is a mental health organization dedicated to building better lives for the millions of Americans affected by mental illness by raising awareness and providing support and education that was not previously available to those in need.

What it reported doing in 2020

Support groups, educational courses, and general advocacy for individuals living with mental illness and families, partners, and friends of individuals living with mental illness. Programs are led by NAMI-trained teachers and encourage confidentiality, hope, relationship building, empathy, and productive discussions. In 2020, approximately 210 individuals attended our programs.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 91% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 38
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 19
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 56.2%; rating input score 56
  • Program expense ratio: 8%; rating input score 8

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -599.3%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.05; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 20.4% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.6% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -10.4% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 56.2% of revenue deployed · 8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $577 in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2016 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 8/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 56/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 4/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.