NAMI Greater Cleveland

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202254268
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Cleveland, OH, USA
Phone
216-875-7776
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Association

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,215,664
Expenses
$1,140,124
Assets
$1,556,421
Liabilities
$35,654

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

21 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN RICE (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KATHERINE H JENKINS (EXECUTIVE DI): $125,360 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support, education, and advocacy for individuals affected by mental illness and their families in Cuyahoga County.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, nami greater cleveland continued to deliver high-impact mental health programs across diverse service areas, significantly expanding community reach and deepening engagement. Our work reflects a strong commitment to education, support, and prevention for individuals and families affected by mental illness. Faith-based programs faith-based programming remained a critical outreach strategy in 2025. Mental health first aid (mhfa) trainings in faith communities reached 65 individuals, while faith-based awareness and education initiatives engaged 1,125 participants. These efforts strengthened partnerships with congregations and expanded culturally responsive mental health support. Peer support peer-led services continued to be a cornerstone of our service model. Connection support groups engaged 1,274 individuals, demonstrating sustained demand for ongoing peer support. Inform & inspire presentations reached 1,024 attendees, promoting recovery and reducing stigma through lived experience. In our own voice (ioov) presentations served 333 individuals, while peer-to-peer education programs reached 12 participants. Caring calls provided 580 supportive calls, offering meaningful one-on-one engagement and helping reduce isolation. Community prevention and education community-based education and prevention efforts saw substantial growth. Community prevention programming, including psychoeducation and outreach events, reached 9,338 individuals. Additional initiatives included 413 youth served through ending the silence (ets), 452 participants through speakers bureau engagements, and 44 individuals trained in mhfa. Our helpline supported 3,408 individuals with information and referrals, while staff presentations reached 599 individuals. Collectively, these efforts significantly increased awareness and access to mental health resources throughout the community. Website and digital outreach digital engagement continued to expand, with 95,644 website views and 68,483 social media impressions. These platforms remain vital tools for disseminating information, promoting programs, and connecting individuals to resources. Family education and support family-focused services remained strong in 2025. Family support groups engaged 979 participants, while family-to-family classes served 20 individuals. Understanding mental illness (umi) programs reached 116 participants, and homefront classes served 9 military-connected individuals and families. These programs equip families with knowledge, coping strategies, and peer support. Youth engagement (youthmove now nami next gen) youth outreach and engagement initiatives connected with 221 young people through recruitment and outreach events, demonstrating continued progress in engaging younger audiences and promoting youth voice in mental health advocacy. Volunteer engagement nami greater cleveland onboarded 45 new volunteers in 2025, reinforcing our commitment to capacity-building and sustaining a strong volunteer base to support program delivery. Professional development in support of continuing education for professionals, nami greater cleveland provided 140 hours of free continuing education units (ceus), fostering knowledge-sharing and strengthening the behavioral health workforce. Conclusion across all major service areas, nami greater cleveland demonstrated meaningful impact and continued growth in 2025. Our programs collectively reached tens of thousands of individuals through direct services, education, and digital engagement. These accomplishments reflect our ongoing dedication to building a more informed, resilient, and supported community through advocacy, education, and peer-driven support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 73
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 48
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73.8%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.79 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.2%; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 11%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.5% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 73.8% of revenue deployed · 78.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $893K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $125K · 21 people listed
  • Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2012 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 55/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 48/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 53/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.