NAMI El Dorado County Western Slope and South Lake Tahoe

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
680073346
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Placerville, CA, USA
Phone
5303064101
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Mental Health Association

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$542,234
Expenses
$422,078
Assets
$184,875
Liabilities
$173

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Diane Rabinowitz (President)
  • Janice Melnicoe (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Diane Rabinowitz (President)
  • Janice Melnicoe (Vice-President)
  • Juline Aguilar (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of NAMI El Dorado County is to provide emotional support education and resources for families and individuals living with mental illness. Through community collaboration and education we advocate for a life of purpose quality and dignity one without discrimination for all people affected by mental illness.

What it reported doing in 2025

CLUBHOUSE EL DORADO. Our Clubhouse offers community-based support services to individuals with mental illness following the evidence-based Clubhouse model utilized by over 350 organizations globally. Situated at 471 Pierroz Road Placerville California it operates on weekdays from 9 am to 5:30 pm. Services are provided collaboratively by members and professional staff encompassing employment education culinary horticulture reception and wellness. In 2025 Clubhouse El Dorado exhibited significant and measurable impact as a burgeoning community-centered mental health program. Members prepared and served more than 8,200 meals during the work-ordered day enhancing practical skills and daily routines. The program aided numerous individuals in attaining increased stability including supporting 69 members with housing and assisting 44 in pursuing educational objectives. Employment remained a key focus with members receiving assistance in resume building interview readiness and job placement leading to a rise in competitive employment successes since the programs inception. On average members dedicated over five hours daily to Clubhouse activities indicating substantial involvement and connection. With over 300 individuals joining since its establishment and sustained engagement throughout the year 2025 marked a period of continuous expansion heightened community involvement and tangible advancements in aiding members in constructing purposeful stable and recovering lives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 67% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Accountability: 82
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 70.8%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 90.9%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $16.51 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 22.2%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 72.5% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 92.2% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 74.5% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 70.8% of revenue deployed · 90.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $384K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 42 of 44 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.