Nami Durham County Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 562143352
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Durham, NC, USA
- Phone
- 9194519243
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,907
- Expenses
- $11,119
- Assets
- $64,960
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SHENIKA ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SHENIKA ALLEN (PRESIDENT)
- LORRAINE CHILDS (VICE PRESIDE)
- JACKY MELENDEZ (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of nami durham is to promote recovery and optimize the quality of life for those in durham county affected by mental illness. Nami durham's vision is to be a community where mental health is recognized and an extra covering of support provided to individuals in durham county affected by mental health challenges, leaving nobody alone in a time of need.
What it reported doing in 2024
We provided training for 420+ community members with "in our own voice", had over 100+ for cit on mental illness, provided wrap support to 20 ppl, gave 250 backpacks to local elementary and middle schools, and picked up over 300 lbs.of trash for our adopt a highway program.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 33
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22.4%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 52.3%; rating input score 52
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 57.1%; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.84; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 22.4% of revenue deployed · 52.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.