Namawi Ltd Namawi Africa Ltd

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
921858136
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Randolph, MA, USA
Phone
6178162475
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Music

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$11,445
Expenses
$11,445
Assets
$5,000
Liabilities
$21,854

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • LYNETTE GITTENS-MACCOW (Foundation Mgr.)
  • WINSTON MACCOW (Director)
  • NADJYA FACEY MACCOW (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a music and arts program to teach and enhance musicianship, in reading, writing, composition and performance education

What it reported doing in 2025

Retained 12 online students Maintined web-presence and online activities to: Increase weekly program operations and online lessons while abroadOngoing web maintenance and development Maintained rental/lease agreement for continued storage of: Tools/equipment/instruments, personal belongings and upkeep such as internet, utilties, and cleaning services.Maintained work and resident permits Maintained worker's ID and national IDsSustained accountant for periodic filings as required.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 4.37; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -144.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 55.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 43/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.