Nalinikids Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
460550749
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2015
Location
Pipersville, PA, USA
Phone
9176907588
Rating
90
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$122,299
Expenses
$257,156
Assets
$104,429
Liabilities
$5,510

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RUPA P MEHTA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SAMUEL GOLDBERG (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RUPA P MEHTA (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • SAMUEL GOLDBERG (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • Scott Tooter (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We believe that movement and reflection should be a part of every child's life. All NaliniKIDS programs uniquely integrate three key domains in the development of healthy individuals: physical, social-emotional, and academic. This proven approach fosters a more connected learning environment where students are ready to learn and empowered to think critically.

What it reported doing in 2025

For over 15 years NaliniKIDS has been focused on creating programs that build healthy habits of movement and reflection that will help children in their daily lives today, and as they grow into adults. NaliniKIDS as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit focuses on helping students make healthy physical and emotional connections so they can be engaged in learning and positively impacting their communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 71% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 94
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 83.7%; rating input score 84

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -110.3%; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.41; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.05; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.2%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.3% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.9% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -4.8% per year; rating input score 0; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $215K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.