NAIOP New York CITY CHAPTER INC C/O Jason Hayes

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
900428079
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
New York, NY, USA
Phone
2124795400
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$19,034
Expenses
$37,938
Assets
$30,252
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RYAN ELAZARI (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • BLAKE GROSCH (CHAPTER VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RYAN ELAZARI (CHAPTER PRESIDENT)
  • BLAKE GROSCH (CHAPTER VICE PRESIDENT)
  • EMILY SNEAD (CHAPTER SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

- to unite persons actively engaged in, or interested in, the development, management, investment in, and financing of commercial real estate through membership in a non-profit association. - to develop through research, discussion and exchange of information better standards for the development, ownership and operation of commercial real estate. - to provide opportunities for members to increase their knowledge of the commercial real estate industry; and to increase their individual capabilities. - to provide leadership on issues of concern to members of the chapter. - to interact with governmental agencies, public utilities, financial and insurance companies. - to conduct or engage in all lawful activities in furtherance of the foregoing purposes or incidental thereto. - to aggressively represent the commercial real estate industry's position with respect to national real estate policy making. - to enhance the image of the commerical real estate industry with the general public.

What it reported doing in 2024

Members unification and provision of real estate knowledge

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -99.3%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.8; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -15.9% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.4% per year; rating input score 0; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 8/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.