Naiop Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 251202166
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Herndon, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7039047100
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $17,890,987
- Expenses
- $15,489,579
- Assets
- $32,696,788
- Liabilities
- $12,707,419
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
86 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MARC SELVITELLI (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
- SHAINE ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO)
- KATHRYN HAMILTON (VICE PRESIDENT FOR MARKETING)
Highest reported compensation
- MARC SELVITELLI (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $773,732 total reported compensation
- AQUILES SUAREZ (SENIOR VP FOR GOVT. AFFAIRS): $452,655 total reported compensation
- SHAINE ANDERSON (EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & COO): $359,859 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
See schedule o
What it reported doing in 2025
Publications: naiop publishes a print and electronic edition of the development magazine quarterly. Through articles and regular columns, the magazine addresses products and issues impacting commercial real estate development, both now and in the future. Topics addressed include leadership and management; regulatory and government affairs; capital markets; investment sales; supply, demand, and rents relating to real estate products; demographics, technology, and consumer behavior; transportation and mobility; sustainability; leasing and marketing; and more.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 90% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 83
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 6 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.4%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.11; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.39; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.2%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 6.5% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 77 of 77 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $774K · 86 people listed · 6 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 4 contractors listed · $744K reported
- Consistency: 14 of 15 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 10 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.