Naiop Ct & Suburban Ny Chapter

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
133525641
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Bloomfield, CT, USA
Phone
8602433977
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$24,384
Expenses
$37,942
Assets
$20,396
Liabilities
$1,310

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ST ONGE JEANNIE (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
  • DIAMOND MICHAEL (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
  • CONDON APRIL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MCGRATH JOANN (AWARDS GALA CHAIR)
  • WITTHUHN SCOTT (DEVELOPING LEADER CHAIR)
  • BREEN JONATHAN (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Connecticut and suburban New York naiop chapter provides value to its members and the communities in which they live and work throughout programs and member communication to share knowledge on real estate issues and market trends while also promoting effective public policy. This chapter is committed to assisting the commercial real estate industry of Connecticut and suburban New York through it's association with naiop's national team of legislative analysts that help shape future legislation and consequently the future of their business endeavors. Additionally, this chapter provides a voice in state and regional issues affecting commercial real estate. This chapter is composed of leaders dedicated to fostering an environment for regional growth.

What it reported doing in 2023

The organization offers events throughout the year to support improvement and development of the commercial real estate industry in the Connecticut and suburban New York area.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -55.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.54; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 97.9% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.2% per year; rating input score 0; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2% per year; rating input score 0; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2011 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.