Naabt Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202595167
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Farmington, CT, USA
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Specifically Named Diseases Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$39
Expenses
$5,925
Assets
$12,419

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • TIMOTHY LEPAK (President)

People named in this filing

  • TIMOTHY LEPAK (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Educate the public about the disease of addiction and treatment options.Help reduce the stigma and discrimination associated with patients with addiction disorders. Serve as a conduit connecting patients in need of treatment to qualified treatment providers.

What it reported doing in 2019

The non-profit patient advocacy group NAABT, the National Alliance of Advocates for Buprenorphine Treatment (http://www.naabt.org), has launched its NationalPatient/Physician Matching System to connect people who are addicted toopioids with doctors able to provide medical treatment with buprenorphine in the privacy of the doctor's office. The free-of-charge matching system is the latest extension of the overall goal of NAABT, which is to educate the public on opioid dependence, buprenorphine treatment, and the benefits of treating addiction in a doctor's private office with prescription.medications and appropriate psychosocial therapy.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 26
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -15,092.3%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.1; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -54.2% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -85.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -38.9% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $6K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2015 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.