Na Mamo O Muolea

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
205764862
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
Location
Hana, HI, USA
Phone
8082488458
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management

Reported finances

Revenue
$136,227
Expenses
$102,264
Assets
$107,207

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • LEGARIO HANK EHARIS (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • LEGARIO HANK EHARIS (PRESIDENT)
  • WAILENA PU (VICE PRESIDE)
  • BRYSON NAKUA KONOHIA-LIND (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To perpetuate traditional ahupuaa management of the muolea ahupuaa and to restore and maintain muoleas natural, cultural, scenic, historic and marine resources for the benefit, education and enjoyment of our community and future generations.

What it reported doing in 2024

By caring for muolea, it can remain a place where families focus on traditional values, share knowledge, and moolelo. By practicing cultural leadership and keeping cultural practices in use, muolea can serve as a model and voice for hawaiians in the communities of muolea, koali, hana, and others in east maui and beyond. We take care to respect and listen to one another so that muolea can be cared for as a healthy gathering place that is a source of life and inspiration for our community. Consistent with the purposes for which the land and shoreline were protected, nmom seeks to protect resources as well as the traditional subsistence uses and those values and practices that help us to care for resources.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 99% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 63
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 71.2%; rating input score 71
  • Program expense ratio: 94.8%; rating input score 95

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.05; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 24.3% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.1% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 54.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 71.2% of revenue deployed · 94.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $97K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.