MySecureKid
Legal name: Mysecurekid Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 824352345
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2023
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Springfield, VA, US
- Phone
- 7038689723
- Rating
- 54
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Children's, Youth Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $85,717
- Expenses
- $87,633
- Assets
- $907
- Liabilities
- $2,900
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- QUIANA GAINEY (Executive Dir.)
- CHANTEL GREEN (Secretary)
- SHARON WATSON (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Mysecurekid’s mission is to increase diversity in cybersecurity and tech by connecting underrepresented communities with education, training, mentorship, and employment opportunities.
What it reported doing in 2023
OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES: MY SECURE KID PROVDIED Cybersecurity virtual events, career days, and training programs for undeserved youth between the ages of 16-24. The funds are used to pay all overhead expenses, pay MSK Staff, training programs, hire certified IT/Cyber instructors, pay for training supplies and provide monthly stipends.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 17
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 16.9%; rating input score 17
- Program expense ratio: 16.6%; rating input score 17
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.2; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -26.6% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site
- Where the money goes: 16.9% of revenue deployed · 16.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 5 filed program accomplishments · $15K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 17/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.