MyMichigan Health

Legal name: Mymichigan Medical Center Alpena

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
386000029
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Midland, MI, US
Phone
(989) 356-8037
Rating
78
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$369,863,753
Expenses
$335,316,015
Assets
$333,259,173
Liabilities
$71,448,942

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SHERWIN CHUCK (FORMER PRESIDENT)
  • ERICKSON MICHAEL (FORMER PRESIDENT)
  • NOSTRANT HUNTER (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • HITZELBERGER DO WILLIAM (PHYSICIAN): $1,286,072 total reported compensation
  • ROSE MICHAEL (SR VP, CFO & TREASURER): $1,183,179 total reported compensation
  • DOMBROSKI MD JEFFREY (PHYSICIAN): $1,136,749 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Create Healthy Communities — Together.

What it reported doing in 2024

Mymichigan medical center alpena's primary line of business is an acute care hospital providing both inpatient and outpatient services. For the reporting period, 4,899 total admissions were provided including 3,795 acute care, 381 newborns, 514 psychiatric and 209 inpatient rehabilitation patients. Also provided were 18,469 visits in our emergency room, 6,624 outpatient surgery cases and 173,292 other outpatient visits. Care is provided regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 98% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Accountability: 73
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.4%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 92.2%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 53.8%; rating input score 54; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 9.3%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.21; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 84.4% of revenue deployed · 92.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $309.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 23 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes executive pay
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 20 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 54/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.