My Sisters' Place Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061079879
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Hartford, CT, USA
Phone
8608082033
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,242,497
Expenses
$4,592,905
Assets
$23,547,180
Liabilities
$7,268,759

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KARA A CAPONE (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • KARA A CAPONE (CEO): $202,005 total reported compensation
  • DANIEL GURVICH (CFO): $193,839 total reported compensation
  • KATHLEEN SHAW (COO): $167,802 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

My sisters place is committed to ending homelessness by empowering women, families, and others in greater hartford to achieve independence and stability in their community by providing housing and supportive services.

What it reported doing in 2024

Supportive housing programs: my sisters' place provides supportive housing for low income individuals and families who were formerly homeless and unable to hold their own lease. Through the mary seymour place apartments and sue ann shay place apartments and the beaumont lofts, msp provides housing and support services for those who meet one or more of the following criteria: low income, living with a mental illness, and/or currently homeless. Security deposit programs - msp operates a few different programs providing limited financial assistance such as security deposits, first month's rent, security deposit guarantees and sometimes small rental arrears to households who are homeless or at risk of homelessness. Available funding varies and specifies what households may be served and what expenses can be covered. The hartford foundation for public giving, the hartford and the first congregational church of vernon have been long-time supporters of these programs. Last year, a total of 220 individuals were served through the rental assistance programs. Housing mobility program - assists 100 individuals and families with housing subsidies to move from areas of low opportunity (usually in cities) to areas of higher opportunity in the hartford region. High opportunity areas are those with better school systems, low crime rates, better transportation and better job opportunities. Staff provide tenant education, mobility counseling, and housing search assistance by meeting with potential clients, landlords, and program staff to match people with opportunities. To qualify, clients must have a section 8 or rap housing voucher along with at least one child 13 or younger living in the household. Last year, a total of 466 individuals were served through the housing mobility counseling program.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 77
  • Transparency & Controls: 71
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 67
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75.6%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: 85.8%; rating input score 86
  • Fundraising efficiency: $18.29 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.4%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.13; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.31; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75.6% of revenue deployed · 85.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $3.9M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $202K · 16 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $189K reported
  • Consistency: 31 of 31 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 57/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.