My Sister's Place Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521263256
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2025295261
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,284,888
- Expenses
- $8,232,872
- Assets
- $9,681,665
- Liabilities
- $434,052
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Highest reported compensation
- MERCEDES LEMP (EXECUTIVE DI): $224,580 total reported compensation
- AMANDA GITTLESON (DIR. OH HR &): $159,915 total reported compensation
- JOVIAH NDAHAYO (DIR. OF GRAN): $152,018 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
My sister's place, inc. Shelters, supports and empowers survivors of domestic violence and their children, while providing leadership and education to build a supportive community.
What it reported doing in 2024
In fy25, msp continued to administer two innovative transitional housing programs, rise (reaching independence through survivor empowerment) and rise plus, offering intensive case management, housing navigation, workforce development, and financial empowerment support to domestic violence survivors and their families. Rise provides 12 months of rental subsidy with assistance to help survivors rebuild credit, secure employment, and obtain permanent leases in their own names. Rise plus builds on the rise model, providing an additional 24 months of support. In the first year, rent is fully subsidized by msp, but in the second year, participants transition to a rapid rehousing model to prepare them to independently pay rent when they transition out of the program. In fy2025, msp's rise program served 177 survivors (head of household + dependents) and rise plus served 124 survivors (head of household + dependents) in fy25, msp served 616 survivors and provided 8,277 case management sessions across all programs. Highlights included msp's housing navigator achieving certification as a national standards for the physical inspection of real estate (nspire) inspector and clients moving into rental units within 1-2 weeks of application approval, which is much quicker than the dc rapid rehousing average of 15-30 days. Additionally, rise trust, msp's signature cash transfer initiative, launched its second cohort, providing 30 families with 500/month in cash assistance paired with financial education. A study of the first cohort conducted with the urban institute found that 31% of participants reduced their debt, 24% exited entirely debt-free, participant anxiety decreased from 58% to 37.5%, and children's access to healthcare rose from 68% to 87% over one year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 83% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.5%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: $28.7 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 11.3%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 16.2% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 89% of revenue deployed · 89.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $7.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $225K · 21 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 43/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.