My People Community Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464463033
IRS 990 coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
East Hartford, CT, USA
Phone
8606560450
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,486,613
Expenses
$5,363,428
Assets
$568,594
Liabilities
$463,812

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ABDUL-RAHMAAN MUHAMMAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • ABDUL-RAHMAAN MUHAMMAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $162,439 total reported compensation
  • DR DAYESHELL MUHAMMAD (DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS): $110,889 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mpcs builds trust through community-based mental health, youth, and family supports across ct. We provide therapeutic, preventive, & supportive services designed to help individuals heal, strengthen community connections, & reduce barriers to care.

What it reported doing in 2024

Urban trauma: together with the Connecticut department of children and families, mpcs is assisting in designing a urban trauma collective care center. By implementing an alternative intervention designed to uniquely meet the mental health needs of african american and latino children living in urban communities, mpcs can help close the mental health treatment gaps associated with this population.positive youth development ("pyd"): pyd is a research-based approach that guides communities in the way they organize support and opportunities so that young people can develop to their full potential. At its fullest expression pyd is undertaken by communities in collaboration with young people to provide the environments, relationships, and experiences all youth need to thrive. More often, it is an approach led by youth-serving organizations and programs to improve their effectiveness and co-create better outcomes with and for youth. Pyd is an intentional, prosocial approach that engages youth within their families, peer groups, schools, organizations and communities in a manner that is productive and constructive; recognizes, utilizes, and enhances youth's strengths and assets; and promotes positive outcome for young people by providing opportunities, fostering positive relationships and furnishing the support needed to build on their leadership strengths.the manhood tree: comprised of four community based initiatives that aim to support men and fathers. The initiatives emphasize the importance of men's mental and physical health and provides men the opportunity to tell their story. The manhood tree initiatives stretch men outside of their comfort zone and encourage them to venture into topics and areas of their lives they don't often visit.life after high school: navigating the future is a comprehensive initiative designed to guide high school students, beginning in the 11th grade, through the pivotal transition into life after high school. Our program, aptly named life after high school (lahs), is committed to equipping students with the skills and knowledge essential for success in various post graduation paths, whether it be higher education, the workforce, entrepreneurship, vocational programs, or service in the armed forces.the dream chaser academy (dca): a transformative program designed to inspire and empower young people to pursue their dreams with confidence. Our goal is to shift perspectives from "i can't" to "i can, and from "stop dreaming" to "never stop dreaming."

Operating model

Revenue model
Grant-funded. 94% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 77
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.2%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.82; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 5.1%; rating input score 53; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 12.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $4.4M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $162K · 6 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 53/100.