My Nose Turns Red Theatre Company
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 311203908
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Covington, KY, USA
- Phone
- 8595817100
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Theater
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $131,374
- Expenses
- $163,850
- Assets
- $14,307
- Liabilities
- $52,412
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEAN ST JOHN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- ERIN ROLL (PRESIDENT)
- GRACE ROYALTY (PAST PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JEAN ST JOHN (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $30,770 total reported compensation
- STEVE ROENKER (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $18,690 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Through the art of the theatrical clown and the one-ring circus, my nose turns reds cultivates a supportive environment that inspires youth to challenge themselves, develop essential life skills and engage audiences.
What it reported doing in 2025
My nose turns reds (mntr) year-round circus arts programs are designed to build youth capacity in persistance, confidence, creativity and collaboration. The circus youth in action, mntrs creative youth development program, ages 13-18, builds teens critical thinking, creativity, collaboration and communication. After-school and summer camps - the experience of learning circus skills, and performing in showcases for their friends and families fosters youth empowerment and strengthens trust and solidarity within the community. Mnr performances - mntr produces the annual youth circus extravaganza, ten free circus in the parks programs and circ-a-thon, offering diverse opportunities for community involvement and celebration. Mntr also performs at schools, libraries, and special events.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 77
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.4%; rating input score 87
- Program expense ratio: 70.1%; rating input score 70
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -24.7%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.09; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 3.66; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 30.2%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -11.8% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -45.2% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.4% of revenue deployed · 70.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $115K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $31K · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 13/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.